Lee Cronin’s The Mummy arrives with the promise of reinvention—an opportunity to exhume one of horror’s most enduring icons and reshape it for a modern audience. Instead, what emerges is something far less ambitious: a possession film awkwardly draped in the aesthetic and mythology of a legacy monster. The result is not just a missed opportunity, but a fundamental misreading of what makes The Mummy endure as a cinematic figure.
“Cronin’s The Mummy doesn’t resurrect a legend—it reduces it to a genre afterthought.”
At its core, the film struggles with identity. Rather than lean into the rich, mythological terror of the mummy’s curse—an ancient evil tied to history, ritual, and consequence—the script pivots toward a far more familiar and diluted structure: a standard possession narrative. This choice isn’t inherently flawed, but here it feels creatively evasive. The mythology of the mummy becomes little more than window dressing, a superficial connection that never justifies the film carrying the name at all.
Cronin, who both writes and directs, demonstrates a clear understanding of tone, but not of legacy. His vision is consistent—this is undeniably a possession film—but consistency alone is not enough when the foundation itself feels misaligned. The film never reconciles its dual identity, instead hovering in a liminal space between reinvention and imitation. It wants to modernize the myth while simultaneously abandoning the very elements that define it.
“This isn’t a reinvention—it’s a bait-and-switch dressed in bandages.”
Where the film does find footing is in its technical execution. Cinematographer David Garbett delivers striking, controlled imagery that elevates the material beyond its narrative shortcomings. The visual language is crisp and deliberate, capturing both the physical dread and emotional unease with precision. There’s a noticeable effort to imbue the film with a sense of cinematic weight—an atmosphere that often suggests a better film lurking beneath the surface.
Garbett’s work, in particular, gives the film a level of polish that its script fails to support. Each frame is composed with intention, drawing out tension even when the narrative itself falters. It’s a reminder that The Mummy is not without craft—it simply lacks cohesion.
The performances, however, land in a more uneven territory. Jack Reynor delivers a performance that feels uncharacteristically restrained and, at times, disengaged. There are flashes of emotional clarity, but they’re buried beneath a characterization that never fully takes shape. It’s a surprising step back, especially considering the depth he brought to films like Midsommar. Here, his work feels constrained—not just by the script, but by a lack of definitional purpose within the narrative.
By contrast, Natalie Grace emerges as one of the film’s more compelling presences. While not given the material to fully break through, her performance carries a sense of authenticity that the film otherwise struggles to sustain. Still, even the stronger performances feel limited by characters that are underwritten and structurally thin.
“The cast isn’t failing the material—the material is failing them.”
This ultimately becomes the film’s defining issue: a disconnect between intention and execution. The Mummy gestures toward something larger—a reimagining, a tonal shift, a modern horror identity—but never commits to any of it. Instead, it settles into the familiar rhythms of a studio possession film, one that feels content to operate within established boundaries rather than challenge them.
For a character as historically rich and cinematically iconic as the mummy, this is a particularly glaring shortcoming. The film doesn’t just fail to elevate the material—it actively diminishes it, stripping away the mythic weight in favor of generic convention.
In the end, The Mummy is not undone by a lack of ambition, but by a lack of conviction. It knows what it wants to be on a surface level, but never interrogates whether that direction serves the character it’s resurrecting.
“A visually polished film that buries its own potential beneath safer, smaller ideas.”
Related Reviews
Duse (HKIFF 2026): Performance Without Spectacle
Brand New Landscape (2026) — A Quiet Devastation of Modern Fatherhood | New Directors/New Films 2026